LSTOWN-L Archives

LISTSERV List Owners' Forum

LSTOWN-L

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Timothy Casten <[log in to unmask]>
Mon, 3 Feb 1997 19:14:11 -0500
text/plain (59 lines)
this sounds to me as if you could set up a horrendous endless loop with
this setup?

timbo:D




At 04:12 PM 2/3/97 -0600, Randy Holder sent a message saying:
>Hope it's ok to ask this here and it is not a faq. I tried checking the faq
>and didn't see it.
>
>Ok here's the situation:
>
>I manage two listserv lists; both are closed to the public and are for our
>staff.  List A is the larger more general list.  List B is a specialized
>group of staff and therefore is a subset of list A. I want persons on List
>B to receive posts from List A in addition to normal posts. So, I've
>subscribed List B to List A. This eliminates the need to subscribe new
>hires to both lists.
>
>This works well except that when List B distributes a post that was
>originally sent to List A, it replaces the reply-to: header with its own
>reply-to address.  So no one on list B can tell which list the post came
>from. That causes another problem. If someone on list B replies to the
>post, it only get's distributed on list B.
>
>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>So in summary here's what I'm hoping to achieve:
>The LIST-B address is subscribed to LIST-A.
>
>#1) A post to LIST-A  goes to subscribers on both LIST-A and LIST-B.
>-This works fine.
>
>#2) A post to LIST-A shows that it's from LIST-A to subscribers that
>receive it through LIST-B.
>-Reply-to: currently shows that the message is from List-B.
>
>#3) A reply to a post on List-A goes to subscribers on both lists.
>-A reply from a person on List-B currently goes to List-B subscribers only
>not to the larger List-A.
>
>#4) A post to LIST-B goes to LIST-B subscribers only.
>-Works fine
>
>#5) A reply to LIST-B goes to LIST-B subscribers only.
>-Works fine.
>
>
>I know this sounds like I'm a raving madman but, this is my best attempt to
>describe the situation via e-mail.  This method almost works. If I could
>just get #2 and #3 to work, it would be a perfect method.  Suggestions?
>Please respond to me direct.  Thanks.
>
>Randy H.
>Computing Services
>University of Arkansas
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2