On 12 Jun 97 11:52:20 -0400, [log in to unmask] wrote:
>On 12 Jun 97 at 12:05, Bill wrote:
>
>> I have noticed  that the number on the letter asking for OK'ing  the
>> message (approval required) does not correspond to the letter that
>> confirms the OK . Why do these numbers not match or relate in some way so
>> I could match the confirmations against the OK's, if I needed to.
>
>   The numbers actually do match, but you may be confusing internally
>coded job numbers with cookie's.  If you can post an example from the logs
>where the cookies do not match but are accepted I might be better able to
>point out where the confusion lies.

I sent you a message showing 2 messages that are a confirmation of the
same message but the numbers do not match to me. I never received an
answer to that message so here are two more, just in case that message
is lost somewhere.

-------- Message #1 -----------------------------------------

Date:         Sat, 14 Jun 1997 09:17:43 -0500
From:
 "L-Soft list server at University of Alabama (1.8c)"
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      BAMAFAN: approval required (0A4CFE)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                                         ^^^^^^^
To:           Bill Harrison <[log in to unmask]>

This message was originally submitted by [log in to unmask] to the
BAMAFAN list
at UA1VM.UA.EDU.  You can approve  it using the  "OK" mechanism,
ignore  it, or
repost an  edited copy. The  message will expire  automatically and
you  do not
need to do  anything if you just want  to discard it. Please refer  to
the list
owner's  guide  if  you  are  not  familiar  with  the  "OK"
mechanism;  these
instructions  are  being  kept  purposefully  short  for  your
convenience  in
processing large numbers of messages.

------------------ Original message (ID=0A4CFE) (22 lines)
--------------------
Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
Received: from UA1VM (NJE origin V2SMTP-O@UA1VM) by UA1VM.UA.EDU
(LMail
          V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 9423; Sat, 14 Jun 1997 09:16:27
-0500
Received: from emout05.mail.aol.com (198.81.11.96) by UA1VM.UA.EDU
   (IBM VM SMTP V2R3) with TCP; Sat, 14 Jun 97 09:16:26 CDT
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by emout05.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0)
          id KAA24117 for [log in to unmask];
          Sat, 14 Jun 1997 10:16:42 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 1997 10:16:42 -0400 (EDT)
From: [log in to unmask]
Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: NATIONAL CHAMPS? Who cared in 57?

ESPN had a special a few years ago that had the top ten all time
greatest
college teams and BAMA had one of the teams from the 60's on 65 I
think, also
the team of 92 was added. Needless to say the awbos had zero, nilch,
nada.
They just can't accept being 2nd fiddle to BAMA.

PS ithink Nebraska 73 was #1 alltime ( according to ESPN), but we all
know
who is  really #1.

------------------- Message #2 -------------------------

Date:         Sat, 14 Jun 1997 09:28:58 -0500
From:
 "L-Soft list server at University of Alabama (1.8c)"
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Output of job "billh" from [log in to unmask]
To:           Bill Harrison <[log in to unmask]>

> ok
Confirming:
> APPROVE BAMAFAN 27D5F3
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                  ^^^^^^
Message successfully approved.
-----------------------

Thanks for your help.


--
Bill Harrison
[log in to unmask]