Our list header templates used to have the keyword statements sorted
alphabetically. Some time ago, I modified the templates to put the
most-frequently accessed statements at the top of the list header, in
something resembling functional groups - owners and editors first, followed
by "access rights" (confidential, subscription, review, send, reply-to
(because it is related to send)), notebook and digest settings, and
attachment-handling (language, attachments). Everything else is still
sorted alphabetically. It works for us, and we have over 4300 lists. YMMV.

On Wed, 12 Jun 2002 11:30:06 -0500, Winship <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>Well, Pete's arangement makes no sense to me either, but neither does
>arranging keywords alphabetically.  Comes to that, the stock L-SOFT sorting
>by "function" makes no sense to me either as I totally disagree about the
>primary function of some keywords (I don't think that way).  So, I arrange
>my list headers as suits me.  To each his own, long as it works.

--
Paul Russell
Senior System Administrator
O&E Messaging Services Team
University of Notre Dame