Fri, 22 Jul 1994 07:46:21 EST
|
On Fri, 22 Jul 1994 00:08:54 +0200 Eric Thomas said:
>On Thu, 21 Jul 1994 17:38:05 -0500 Ol' blue eyes
><[log in to unmask]> said:
>> It's *easy* to set a bad address nomail, so 'renew' will
>> eventually delete it, or delete it.
>
>Most lists do not use "renew", and a user that got set NOMAIL is as good
>as a signed off user. In fact, setting NOMAIL would be even worse. The
>user, not seeing any mail, would send a SUBSCRIBE command, and be told
>he's already on the list.
I always wondered about this.... Why doesn't LISTSERV say, "You're
already on the list, your settings are ... and if you want to receive
mail again, just SET listname MAIL."
* Intelligence demands reasons, not rules.
|
|
|