Forwarded message:
 
I am forwarding this auto-delete because there was no error report
sent. I have a few people that I just don't seem to be able to delete
from the list so I am conscious of error reports, but carpenter was
not one of them. How did he get auto-deleted without my knowledge of
the errors? --  Paul.
 
> From @CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU:[log in to unmask]  Tue Aug 16 08:47:10 1994
> Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
> Date:         Tue, 16 Aug 1994 08:48:15 -0400
> From: BITNET list server at SJUVM (1.8a) <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject:      COMPUMED: [log in to unmask] auto-deleted
> To: "Paul S. di Virgilio" <[log in to unmask]>
> X-Lsv-Listid: None
>
> The following users have been removed ("auto-deleted", in list owner jargon)
> from the COMPUMED list as a  result of the nondelivery error report enclosed
> below.  No action  is  required from  you;  this message  is  only for  your
> information.
>
> List of deleted users:
>
>  [log in to unmask]
>
> ------------------------ Nondelivery report (48 lines) -----------------------
+ -
> Return-Path: <>
> Received: from SJUVM.STJOHNS.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@SJUVM) by
>           SJUVM.STJOHNS.EDU (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 9053; Tue,
>           16 Aug 1994 08:47:33 -0400
> Received: from SJUVM (NJE origin SMTP@SJUVM) by SJUVM.STJOHNS.EDU (LMail
>           V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 9050; Tue, 16 Aug 1994 08:47:28 -0400
> Received: from uga.cc.uga.edu by SJUVM.STJOHNS.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with
+ TCP;
>    Tue, 16 Aug 94 08:47:26 EDT
> Received: from SMTC by uga.cc.uga.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with TCP;
>    Tue, 16 Aug 94 08:47:47 EDT
> Date: Tue, 16 Aug 1994 08:51:36 EDT
> From: Local delivery agent <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <@uga.cc.uga.edu:[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: LOCAL delivery error
> X-Report-Type: Nondelivery; boundary="> Error description:"
>
> Note: this message was generated automatically.
>
> An error was detected while processing the enclosed message.  A list of
> the affected recipients follows.  This list is in a special format that
> allows software like LISTSERV to automatically take action on incorrect
> addresses; you can safely ignore the numeric codes.
>
> --> Error description:
> Error-For:  [log in to unmask]
> Error-Code: 3
> Error-Text: No such local user
>
> Error-End:  1 error detected
>
> ------------------------------ Rejected message ------------------------------
> Received: from uga.cc.uga.edu by SMTC (MX V3.3 VAX) with SMTP; Tue, 16 Aug
+ 1994
>  08:51:34 EDT
> Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU by uga.cc.uga.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP
+ id
>  2771; Tue, 16 Aug 94 08:47:07 EDT
> Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@UGA) by UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (
+ LMail
>  V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 4955; Tue, 16 Aug 1994 08:44:43 -0400
> Date: Tue, 16 Aug 1994 08:41:03 -0400
> Reply-To: "St. John's University Computers in Medicine List"
>  <[log in to unmask]>
> Sender: "St. John's University Computers in Medicine List"
>  <[log in to unmask]>
> From: "Martin A. Thompson" <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: EARN & CREN standards
> X-To:         [log in to unmask]
> To: Multiple recipients of list COMPUMED <[log in to unmask]
+ edu>
>
> Please give me pointers to EARN and CREN convention documents...
>
 
 
--
 
Dr. Paul S. di Virgilio,  University of Toronto  [log in to unmask]