thank you for your kindness.

Barrett Culmback

-----Original Message-----
From: LISTSERV list owners' forum
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Dan Robinson Indexing
Services
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 1:23 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: warning: [log in to unmask]


Thank you.... a name attached to the message would have cleared
things up quickly. Your name is on the web in quite a few places
and I hope you are enjoying your time on the net.

I must admit that those of us running the lists are hypersensitive to
the possibility of being spammed and a cryptic name @ prodigy,
aol, msn, hotmail, or yahoo without a real name to check is a red
flag.

Dan Robinson
[log in to unmask]


On 6 Dec 00, at 13:04, rbnwic rbcnwmicr wrote:

> Thank you.  Will do so from now on.
>
> Barrett Culmback
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: LISTSERV list owners' forum
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Dan Robinson Indexing
> Services
> Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 12:53 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: warning: [log in to unmask]
>
>
> A name to go with an address is helpful. If only when answering a
> query/warning on a listowners list. I find this to be a nice courtesy
> on many professional lists.
>
> Dan Robinson
> drobinson2hwwilson.com
>
>
> On 6 Dec 00, at 12:45, rbnwic rbcnwmicr wrote:
>
> > agree w/ you there ... did not know one required a 'pedigree' ... in the
> > future will use a 'non-spammer-type' email address.  Thank you for the
> > insight.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: LISTSERV list owners' forum
> > [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Nathan Brindle
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 12:27 PM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: warning: [log in to unmask]
> >
> >
> > Well, given that you didn't tell anyone that you were a Stanford Ph.D.
> > and subscribed from an address that looks suspiciously like one a
spammer
> > would use, I'm not particularly surprised at the response you got. :)
> >
> > Nathan
> >
> > On Wed, 6 Dec 2000 12:24:41 -0800 rbnwic rbcnwmicr said:
> > >I am 'the joker' ... just 'happen' to have wide-ranging interests and
> > >subscribed to lists per them.  Sorry to 'bother' you 'watchers.'  I
have
> > >never spammed or spoofed ... not my 'trip.'  Guess a Ph.D. from
Stanford
> > >isn't enough to 'merit' list-membership?  Not to mention 33 years of
> > college
> > >teaching.  :-)
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: LISTSERV list owners' forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On
> > >Behalf Of Scout
> > >Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 12:06 PM
> > >To: [log in to unmask]
> > >Subject: Re: warning: [log in to unmask]
> > >
> > >
> > >> I did a simple DejaNews search:
> > >>
> > >> http://www.deja.com/usenet
> > >>
> > >> and found no hits (though I'm in there so I guess the SEARCH function
> > >> does work).
> > >
> > >Don't know if this person has spammed to usenet .. and it's very rare..
> in
> > >my opinion, for someone to to to all the work to sub to.. confirm sub,
> then
> > >spam email lists.. so whoever this joker is.. gotta admire the work
ethic
> > >;-))
> > >
> > >  ...Cleo  [log in to unmask]
> >
>