Tue, 18 Feb 1997 07:02:21 -0800
|
Could someone explain to me the relationship between mail.pilot.net and
the members address <[log in to unmask]>. Why wouldn't it be WRS.com that
rejected this post?
Janis
__________________________________________________________
Received: from dresden.american.edu (dresden.american.edu [147.9.1.3])
by atlanta.american.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA39717
for <[log in to unmask]>; Tue, 18 Feb 1997
06:14:12 -0500
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
by dresden.american.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id GAA93246
for [log in to unmask]; Tue, 18 Feb 1997
06:13:09 -0500
Received: from mail.pilot.net (ns.pilot.net [198.232.147.10])
by dresden.american.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA83398
for <[log in to unmask]>; Tue, 18 Feb 1997 04:41:04
-0500
Received: from localhost (localhost) by mail.pilot.net with internal id
BAJ15210; Tue, 18 Feb 1997 01:41:21 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 1997 01:41:21 -0800 (PST)
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Warning: could not send message for past 4 hours
Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (warning-timeout)
**********************************************
** THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY **
** YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE **
**********************************************
The original message was received at Mon, 17 Feb 1997 21:30:11 -0800
(PST)
from atlanta.american.edu [147.9.1.6]
----- The following addresses have delivery notifications -----
<[log in to unmask]> (transient failure)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
<[log in to unmask]>... Deferred: Connection timed out with mail.wrs.com.
|
|
|