I have a subscriber, <[log in to unmask]> that is
probably the intended receiver that the RUSH Mailer can't find.  Is
there a "good way" to know that I have guessed right??  I believe
every list message is rejected in the same fashion!!  (56 so far
today)  ;-((   . . . Phil---
 
------- Forwarded Message Follows -------
 
Date:       Thu, 18 Jun 1992 13:42:13 -0600
From:       Revised List Processor <[log in to unmask]> (1.7c)
Subject:    Delivery error notice sent to list TQM-L
To:         PHIL ENDACOTT <[log in to unmask]>
 
The enclosed mail file, found in the TQM-L reader and shown under the spoolid
8786 in  the console log,  has been identified  as a possible  delivery error
notice for the following reason: mail subject indicates a delivery problem.
 
------------------------ Message in error (109 lines) -------------------------
Received: from UICVM by UKANVM.BITNET (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 2825; Thu,
 18 Jun 92 13:41:43 CST
Received: from UICVM by UICVM (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 4093; Thu, 18 Jun 92
 13:42:06 CDT
Received: from RUSHVM by UICVM.UIC.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R1) with BSMTP id 7588;
   Thu, 18 Jun 92 13:42:01 CST
Message-Id:  <18JUN92.14668390.0004.MUSIC@RUSHVM>
Date:        Thu, 18 Jun 92 13:34:54 EDT
From:        MAILER AT RUSHVM <[log in to unmask]>
To:          TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION
             <[log in to unmask]>,
             Postmaster <$EMP@RUSHVM>
Subject: Undeliverable Mail
 
 
The following errors occurred while attempting to send this mail file.
 
Sender is: [log in to unmask]
 
*13.34.52 No LOCAL mail recipient found in the mail envelope
 
-----------------------------  ORIGINAL MESSAGE  -------------------------------
 
Received: from UICVM by UICVM (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 3837; Thu, 18 Jun 92
 13:40:11 CDT
Received: from UICVM.BITNET by UICVM (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 3813; Thu, 18
 Jun 92 13:40:00 CDT
Date:         Thu, 18 Jun 1992 14:39:00 EST
Reply-To:     "TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION"
              <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       "TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION"
              <[log in to unmask]>
From:         JIM DOWNEY <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: Confusing Our Role
To:           Multiple recipients of list TQM-L <[log in to unmask]>
 
 
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|*|  PHIL ENDACOTT  (PE38)      |*|    <[log in to unmask]>  |*|
|*|  FACILITIES OPERATIONS      |*|        <[log in to unmask]>  |*|
|*|  THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   |*|  LAWRENCE, KS   PH: 913-864-3204  |*|
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=