Sat, 30 Dec 1995 13:38:01 -0500
|
-- [ From: Huy Vu * EMC.Ver #2.5.02 ] --
> >After sending it to listserv, the reply would come back saying user1 to
> >user299 were subscribed but user300 (I'm not sure on the exact
> >numbering) and everyone afterwards could not be added because of an
> >invalid password (the log says the same thing). I know the password
> >isn't wrong because I used to same macro to spit out the above strings.
>
> The macro could have done something wrong.
All the macro did was concatenate "add listname " + emailaddress + " * pw=
mypassword"
to all record in one field (emailaddress field) and saved it in another. I
then exported the field out to an ASCII text file.
>
> >So I try to find out from Listserv what it had for my password. Well it
> >came back and said that there wasn't a password for me!
>
> Did you *have* a personal password when you started this, or did you use
the
> list password?
I created the password several days prior (using the PW ADD command) and I
used my own personal password versus using the list password.
>
> Anyway, it's impossible to say much about this without seeing the full
> log. You say that at some point it started saying that you had the wrong
> password. Well, just before that it probably said something important.
>
Nothing in the logs about errors - here they are: (If it would help I'll
send you the entire logs - I would get killed if posted the entire files -
this post is long enough)
Here's part of the actual command list email sent to Listserv (email names +
my password were changed to protect the innocent):
ADD warrior-l [log in to unmask] * PW= mypassword
ADD warrior-l [log in to unmask] * PW= mypassword
add warrior-l [log in to unmask] * PW= mypassword
add warrior-l [log in to unmask] * PW= mypassword
Here's part of the log I received back from Listserv:
> ADD warrior-l [log in to unmask] *
"(No Name)" <[log in to unmask]> has been added to the WARRIOR-L
list. Notification has been sent to [log in to unmask]
> ADD warrior-l [log in to unmask] *
"(No Name)" <[log in to unmask]> has been added to the WARRIOR-L list.
Notification has been sent to [log in to unmask]
> add warrior-l [log in to unmask] *
Invalid password supplied. Acceptable passwords are: your personal password
(obtained through the "PW ADD" command) and the password of the WARRIOR-L
list. If you have forgotten your password, send a "PW RESET" command to
reset it or, if this fails, contact the LISTSERV administrator
([log in to unmask]) for assistance.
> add warrior-l [log in to unmask] *
Invalid password supplied. Acceptable passwords are: your personal password
(obtained through the "PW ADD" command) and the password of the WARRIOR-L
list. If you have forgotten your password, send a "PW RESET" command to
reset it or, if this fails, contact the LISTSERV administrator
([log in to unmask]) for assistance.
Here's the log off the server:
29 Dec 1995 17:59:01 From [log in to unmask]: ADD warrior-l [log in to unmask]
compaq.com * PW= mypassword
29 Dec 1995 17:59:01 Sent information mail to [log in to unmask]
29 Dec 1995 17:59:01 To [log in to unmask]: "(No Name)" <[log in to unmask]
COMPAQ.COM> has been added to the WARRIOR-L (...)
29 Dec 1995 17:59:01 From [log in to unmask]: ADD warrior-l [log in to unmask]
wku.edu * PW= mypassword
29 Dec 1995 17:59:01 Sent information mail to [log in to unmask]
29 Dec 1995 17:59:01 To [log in to unmask]: "(No Name)" <[log in to unmask]
WKU.EDU> has been added to the WARRIOR-L list. (...)
29 Dec 1995 17:59:01 From [log in to unmask]: add warrior-l [log in to unmask]
wku.edu. * PW= mypassword
29 Dec 1995 17:59:01 To [log in to unmask]: Invalid password supplied.
Acceptable passwords are: your personal password (...)
29 Dec 1995 17:59:01 From [log in to unmask]: add warrior-l [log in to unmask] *
PW= mypassword
29 Dec 1995 17:59:01 To [log in to unmask]: Invalid password supplied.
Acceptable passwords are: your personal password (...)
> Also, are you running LISTSERV off an NTFS partition?
Yes, why? Don't tell me a NT program can't run off NTFS properly.
>
> Eric
>
Sorry about the long post,
Huy
|
|
|