Thu, 12 Jan 1995 12:15:36 +0100
|
On Fri, 6 Jan 1995 13:37:37 -0600 Steve Hirby
<[log in to unmask]> said:
> Of course. But if something can't be declared to be reliable, then
>it is perforce unreliable. So the design question becomes, "Do I take my
>chances?" (on the principle learned from _The_Soul_of_a_New_Machine_,
>that "Not everything worth doing is worth doing well"), or do I conclude
>that the state of the art won't allow me to implement a certain feature,
>no matter how desirable, 'cause I can't promise that it will work as
>designed and intended?
>
> To be sure, LISTSERV gives us (listowners) the choice--we don't
>have to use auto-delete if we can't stand the flack it may generate
>and/or don't want to run the risk of disappointing some of the very
>people we're trying to help. But that doesn't change the fundamental
>question; it just pushes it back on us.
You're making a long story out of something which is really very simple.
The problem is that today's computers are abysmally stupid. Unlike
humans, when they screw up in a blatant way, they don't realize that
they're screwing up. So the computer in charge of a post office can go on
telling you that there isn't a living soul in the entire campus and not
realize the enormity of what it's saying. The computer processing the
reply has no way to realize that the other computer is screwing up,
because the number of negative replies is very small compared to the size
of the post office. The 5 errors it is getting could be a screwup, or it
could be 5 students out of 10,000 having dropped a course. Most of the
time, it will be the latter, but then sometimes it will be a screwup.
Given all this there are three possible courses of action:
1. Not use computers at all because they are not reliable.
2. Try to use computers anyway with a supervising human in charge.
3. Step on the closest soapbox and argue #1 and #2 to death.
You will find a lot of supporters no matter which option you select.
LISTSERV gives you a choice between #1 and #2, and the opportunity to
create your own mailing list to discuss #3. What else do you want? :-)
Eric
|
|
|