Thu, 26 May 1994 11:12:41 EDT
|
On Thu, 26 May 1994 09:54:38 EDT you said:
> I have just had a great suggestion from a subscriber on another
>list concerning the flood of commercial messages (greencard lawyers,
>thigh-cream) on the internet.
> It is this: can we legally play the capitalist game the way it
>should be played? Our subscribers are clearly a demographic group
>desirable to advertisers. We (list owner/moderators) are presumably
>like the publishers of a paper and we can determine the value of our
>subscribers. Is there any reason why, if an advertiser like the
>greencard lawyers can claim to make a profit from our lists, we
>cannot?
> Therefore, I suggest we list owners post immediately our rates.
>For Journet, I will invoice any unsolicited commercial posters the
>token sum of
Nice idea, but its illegal for many Listserv sights. As a non-profit
institution, Temple is not allowed to generate revenue from our academic
computer systems. I think this is also a condition of the license agreement
with L-Soft, the group that publishes Listserv software, but I am not
possitive about that. Even if this were legal for all sites, its damned hard
to implement from a technical standpoint. I would not be suprised if the
cost for billing these companies outweighed the money earned from them.
Stan Horwitz Internet: [log in to unmask] Bitnet: STAN@TEMPLEVM
Temple University -- Senior Consultant (My views are all mine!)
Manager of the Help-Net and Suggest lists and Listserv Postmaster.
Stan Horwitz Internet: [log in to unmask] Bitnet: STAN@TEMPLEVM
Temple University -- Senior Consultant (My views are all mine!)
Manager of the Help-Net and Suggest lists and Listserv Postmaster.
|
|
|