Wed, 13 Jul 1994 16:33:00 EDT
|
>I don't see why searching listserv archives can't be as simple as writing
>search <desiredword> in <listname>
>Why should it have to be more complicated? What good is all of that
>extra coding?
I can't give a great answer since I did not design it. BUT, thinking
of a similar question: why can't calling long distance through an
alternative long distance carrier be as simple as my calling across
campus using a 5-digit extension?
Answer: because there are more than 10 000 phones in the world.
LISTSERV does more than SEARCH. Search enters a mode of operation
different than just a single one-line command. This makes life (and
LISTSERV) more complicated. That's why a bit-brain like me maintains a
template that I just copy/cut/paste. It saves relearning the
idosyncracies/tricks and is extremely effective.
I guess it could have been designed differently, but then perhaps it
would not have been as powerful?
Just some off-the-cuff musings.
Regards,
-- co-owner INFOSYS, TQM-L, CPARK-L, ERAPPA-L, JANITORS, LDBASE-L, et -L
[log in to unmask] "Are you downsizing or dumbsizing?" +1 814 863 1843
31 Shields Bldg. -- Penn State Univ -- University Park, PA 16802-1202 USA
|
|
|