Hello,

We just updated to 1.8c on Monday 1/28/97 (at American University).  Today I
ent the following message to the server and received a successful storage
onfirmation message.  My goal was to have the following message appearas the
digest header every 5 days.

-------------- begin messae

put shotimes-l digest-h pw=xxxxxxxx
>>> DIGEST_H
.BB &DAYSEQ(5) = 1
             ********* SHOtimes-L DIGEST REMINDER *********

If you reply to a message you read in the SHOtimes-L digest, please change
the subject of your response message to that of the message to which you're
replying.  Otherwise, your reply will have the subject "SHOTIMES-L Digest."

Also, if you duplicate the wording, spacing, and capitalization as they
appear in the subject line of the message to which you're replying,
subsequent digest contents listings will be more compact and easier to read
because the Listserv software will group like subjects together.  Thanks!

.EB

-------------- end message

When I switched myself to digest and back (to get a copy of the pending,
ncomplete digest), I got the following back:

-------------- begin message
Return-Path: [log in to unmask]
Date:     Tue, 28 Jan 1997 16:12:33 -0500
Reply-To: "Taurus SHO Owners' List" <[log in to unmask]>
Sender: "Taurus SHO Owners' List" <[log in to unmask]>
From: Automatic digest processor <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:  SHOTIMES-L Digest - 28 Jan 1997 - Unfinished
To: Recipients of SHOTIMES-L digests <[log in to unmask]>

There are 2 messages totalling 85 lines in this issue.

Topics collected thus far:

  1. Turbos on small engines
  2. The fifteen minute delay.

>>> DIGEST_H
.BB &DAYSEQ(5) = 1
             ********* SHOtimes-L DIGEST REMINDER *********

If you reply to a message you read in the SHOtimes-L digest, please change
the subject of your response message to that of the message to which you're
replying.  Otherwise, your reply will have the subject "SHOTIMES-L Digest."

Also, if you duplicate the wording, spacing, and capitalization as they
appear in the subject line of the message to which you're replying,
subsequent digest contents listings will be more compact and easier to read
because the Listserv software will group like subjects together.  Thanks!

.EB

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:    Tue, 28 Jan 1997 15:55:57 -0800
From:    Jim Treber <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Turbos on small engines

Scott Chan wrote:


        (snip)

> There are a lot of reasons to use turbos over bigger engines or superchargers.
>
> 1) Developing a bigger engine is really, really, expensive compared to lapping
> on a turbo.  So smaller companies without a big block in their portfolio,
e.g.,
> Saab, Volvo, Subaru, Mitsubishi (remember the Dodge Colt Turbo?) can get more
> power with a shorter development time and cost.




        Scott, I've wondered about this. I thought it would take more money to
develope a beefy engine (forged pistons, crank, stronger rods, etc.) for
turbo use verses a naturally aspirited lazy rpm'd big block delivered
with cast pistons and crank along with lighter duty componets.


>
> 2) As you mentioned, turbos are more fuel-efficient because they are only
> on-boost in the upper RPM range.  I put a 7psi turbo on my BMW 320I and the

etc.

-------------- end message

What went wrong?  Why did I get my boolean commands inserted?

TIA

-- John Witherspoon
   [log in to unmask]