Stan wrote:
>It occurs to me that a number of listowner commands, etc., can be
>configured to accept a password.  Why not a listowner post?

yes, you are right. it would be so much easier to insert one extra line by the editor or listowner.

thanks
jacky

-----Original Message-----
From:   Stan Ryckman [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]

John Lyon wrote:
>> Thus my question is how can an automatic system within LISTSERV be
>> developed. One way to narrow the risks is that LISTSERV automatically
>> searches for the domain origin (e.g in my case @swipnet.se) or IP nr
>> in the concealed header of the sent message. This would narrow the
>> ability of such messages to pass through.  I am not a software
>> programme and so I ask - Is this possible ?
>
>I am not a programmer either Jacky, but I'm sure something along those lines
>are certainly possible. Feasable without effecting performance is another
>question.
>
>> or is this a layman's dream ?
>
>For now, I would say yes. The present system by your own admission
>works very well and it is fool-proof.

It occurs to me that a number of listowner commands, etc., can be
configured to accept a password.  Why not a listowner post?

Cheers,
Stan