> Strikes me that one of the central problems with attachments, after
> sheer size, is inconsistency: most of them show up in archives as
> screenfuls of gibberish.  I encourage people to put them on websites
> and post the url to the list (and I'll consider putting them on a Web
> site if they don't have access to one).

MIME attachments show up in the LISTSERV web archives just fine -- as
links that the user can click on do download the file.  Uuencoded
attachments do show up in their raw form.