> > Would not > >Filter= Also,*@*remarq.com > >cover both *@*.remarq.com and *@*remarq.com ? > > Yes, but it also covers [log in to unmask] and so on. > *@*.remarq.com,*@remarq.com has the virtue of blocking all remarq > addresses and _nothing but_ remarq addresses. A perhaps unlikely event but I get the discrimination. Douglas