On 5/12/00 11:07 AM, Rich Greenberg <[log in to unmask]> wrote... >With the new keyword, "* Attachments= no, filter", there seems to be an >unintended side effect. If a post contains only attachments, they are >all filtered out, but the resulting empty post is sent to the list. > >Is this intended? IMHO, the post should be rejected in this case. Technically, LISTSERV *will* reject a message that contains *only* an attachment with the above header. However, it's rare for a message to be completely empty. A signature, even a blank line might be interpreted as content by the LISTSERV. I've yet to test this, though, so I don't know just how tolerant LISTSERV is. -- Adam Bailey | Chicago, Illinois [log in to unmask] | Finger/Web for PGP [log in to unmask] | http://www.lull.org/adam/