> > ... The anti-spam contingent in SPAM-L seems to be completely > > obsessed > >with a macho posture of burning-the-village-to-save-it ... > > This statement is nothing less than an ad hominem attack on every > SPAM-L subscriber. As a subscriber to both LSTOWN-L and SPAM-L, a I'm an active SPAM-L subscriber and don't see Kary's statement being in anyway close to an ad hominem attack on me. There is a contingent on that list that feels like spam should be stopped *at any cost* though. ...Cleo [log in to unmask]