That happens if the sender doesn't remove one address. But our list is
one that generates a lot of replies that should be private, so it is nice
to be able to have both the poster's and list address come up so they can
make a choice.

Anyway, in case others are interested, Scout let me know that
reply-to=both,ignore

will do what we want, so I'm testing that out now.

Russ Hunt wrote:

> Wouldn't replying to both simply mean that the sender would get two
> copies of the reply?

--
Karen Reznek, co-listowner - Asperger
[log in to unmask], [log in to unmask]