That happens if the sender doesn't remove one address. But our list is one that generates a lot of replies that should be private, so it is nice to be able to have both the poster's and list address come up so they can make a choice. Anyway, in case others are interested, Scout let me know that reply-to=both,ignore will do what we want, so I'm testing that out now. Russ Hunt wrote: > Wouldn't replying to both simply mean that the sender would get two > copies of the reply? -- Karen Reznek, co-listowner - Asperger [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask]