At 11:35 AM -0400 05/28/01, Jim Walker wrote (SNIP): >My post was to try to get LSOFT to feel our pain and change language=NOHTML >to respect list owners intent. Surely any list-owner (LITE or classic) can establish a rule barring html and can enforce it by removing violators. And list-owners (classic) can easily reconfigure their own list headers to include language= NOHTML. At 9:00 AM -0400 05/29/01, Russ Hunt wrote (SNIP):: >I'd suggest that this is Micro$oft's problem, not LISTSERV's. (Yes, >I understand that there's >a risk for users of IE 5.5, but I don't see why this is particularly >relevant to LISTSERV.) Perhaps not to LISTSERV per se, but since a lot of people use IE 5.5, it seems relevant to the security of lot of listserv users. ___________________ Jane-Kerin Moffat <[log in to unmask]>