How effective would it be to have the list options "Reply-To= List,Ignore" when dealing with a virus like this? Too bad the list can't be set up to remove the sender address completely. On 15 Jun 2001, at 14:49, Jacob Haller wrote: > >Why wasn't the virus sent to the list address? (We were ready for > >that: we lowered the max. message size to 180 lines). Is there > >anything we can do (with the LSOFT listserv options) to MAKE a virus > >send it to the list address next time, instead of sending off-list > >contaminated messages? > > No. That's under the control of the author of the virus, who > unfortunately doesn't appear to be inclined to make things easy for > list owners. ;-) -- mailto:[log in to unmask] KA7MYM http://cc-ent.com/Spiritbrook ICQ 4014832 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Wherefore he is able also to save them to the uttermost that come unto God by him, seeing he ever liveth to make intercession for them. Hebrews 7:25