In response to these messages: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >>At 3:49 PM -0700 6/15/01, Liz Marr wrote: >>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >>How effective would it be to have the list options "Reply-To= List,Ignore" >>when dealing with a virus like this? > >Ineffective. > >Thanks, >-- >Jacob Haller, Technical Support >L-Soft international, Inc >http://www.lsoft.com/ Is it conceivable that the LSOFT options for message header structure (on the messages it distributes to the members) could be set to "chop off" the REPLY-TO line (and maybe any further reference to the original sender of the message)? Even better would be to leave the sender's name (assuming s/he has loaded it in their name-register) and just eliminate all references to the sender's address. If this is NOT possible, could I suggest it to Jacob Haller, for the future consideration of the LSOFT programming team? It could be termed the "on-list reply only" or "anonymous list" option. Our group has a rule that ALL members MUST put their names and present city-of-residence at the end of each message, but it's hard to enforce, because their names are at the top of the message, in the header. (If the entire REPLY-To line were eliminated, there should be a way the list manager can identify the poster, of course). What do you think? Dennis Hickman CETEFL-L