| |This sounds almost like 'text/plain; format=flowed' as described in: | |RFC2646 The Text/Plain Format Parameter. R. Gellens. August 1999. | (Format: TXT=29175 bytes) (Updates RFC2046) (Status: PROPOSED | STANDARD) | |A number of implementations seem to botch the 'SHOULD be shorter than |80 characters' suggestion in section 4.1 of that RFC, resulting in very |long on-the-wire lines which are "flowed" into readability by |some MUAs. | |Would that explain your symptoms? This RFC comes very close to explaining what's happening here except for one fact. I've sent several test posts attempting to find a workaround and they've definitely been less than 80 characters long. For example, if I send something that looks like this: abc abc abc <abc<abc<abcIt comes out looking like this:abcabcabc<abc<abc<abcI've used three MUAs (MS Outlook 2000, Pegasus 3.12 & FreeAgent 1.21) andsent in MS Rich Text, text/enriched, and text/plain, all with the sameresults. That's what is leading me to believe it's a server (or MTA)problem rather than a problem with how WA is reading and displaying it.Chazzozz!!Michael [log in to unmask]"Before you can grow old and wise you must first survive being young andstupid." - Ancient ProverbNote: Opinions expressed on this list are my own and do not reflect theviews, opinions or position of my employer. If swallowed, seek medicaladvice.