I'll second that. I would still be twiddling my thumbs over here waiting for LSoft support to get back to me on this. Thanks again. Conor -----Original Message----- From: Valdis Kletnieks [mailto:[log in to unmask]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 3:04 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: Email addresses being blocked? On Fri, 15 Feb 2002 14:39:22 CST, Conor Doyle <[log in to unmask]> said: > So it looks like it is still on their end? Sorry, I'm still pretty > inexperienced with these things. Just remember that when some of us started, it was a lot uglier (%-hacks, anybody?), and there wasn't a wealth of experience you could draw on if things went horridly wrong... ;) At least in our old age, the questions are *easy* - unlike (say) the FDDI interface at JVNC that had a bitpattern-dependent timing problem tickled by Bitnet traffic that hosed up the NSFNet-Bitnet gateway one summer, or the bitnet-uucp gateway that I had that kept wedging up because the bisync interface on the Gould PN/9080 didn't implement transparency the way an IBM interface did (it would escape an ASCII SYN char (not to be confused with a TCP SYN packet), but not an EBCDIC one, but not consistently). Enough rambling, time to go back to writing a scope document and listening to some Judas Priest cranked up high enough to drown out the distractions. ;) /Valdis