At 19:06 03/24/2002 Sunday, Michael Shannon wrote: >I've just seen a bunch of errors come through our busiest list that were the >form of rejected postings. The reason given for rejection was exceeding the >maximum message size of 300 lines (which I've explixitly set in the header). >I'm happy to see that LISTSERV is capturing large posts but the problem here >is that it captured its own digests. All the errors were generated by >plaintext digests. Don't be so sure that it is capturing its own. Instead, I willing to bet you that some errant subscriber's email system aka MTA "bounced" it back to the list, and LISTSERV thought that it was a new posting. Unfortunately the subscriber's MTA made it appear as if it the MTA was the LISTSERV. /Pete