Based on the message below, is the sender being treated as [log in to unmask] com ? ------------------------ Rejected message (792 lines) ------------------------- Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]> Received: from mail.xxx.com (146.145.213.67:4350) by listserve.hubbardhost.com (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id <[log in to unmask]>; Wed, 26 Jun 2002 10:55:47 -0500 Received: from abc.xxx.com ([10.14.1.122]) by mail.xxx.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id MRGK0F2R; Wed, 26 Jun 2002 11:34:07 -0400 Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]> X-Sender: [log in to unmask] X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0 Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 11:51:08 -0700 To: [log in to unmask] From: alerts <[log in to unmask]> Christopher A. Ferraro Senior Systems Engineer, Hubbard One p: 312.939.5000 x 269 f: 312.939.6000 m: 312.286.8466 m2: 312.420.6678 -----Original Message----- From: Paul Russell [mailto:[log in to unmask]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 9:19 AM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: Rejected posting from editor on announce-only list In one of his messages in this thread, Ben Parker suggested that you check the headers on the message that is being sent to the list to see if there is a "Sender:" header. Have you done this? If there is a "Sender:" header present in a message processed by LISTSERV, that header will be given precedence over the "From:" header. On Wed, 26 Jun 2002 Christopher Ferraro <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >Whoops, I sent the wrong note previously. I meant implemented the >fixes below suggested by Ben. Does anyone have any other ideas ? -- Paul Russell Senior System Administrator O&E Messaging Services Team University of Notre Dame