On 01/15/2003 06:11:43 PM [log in to unmask] wrote: >>(before SET LIST): >> >> RDR FILE 0126 SENT FROM SMTP2 PUN WAS 0446 RECS 0007 CPY 001 A NOHOLD >> NOKEEP >> 15 Jan 1903 08:50:09 Processing file 0126 from SMTP2@MSACVM >> 15 Jan 1903 08:50:09 -> BSMTP from [log in to unmask] >> 15 Jan 1903 08:50:09 -> 1 recipient (1 local). >> 15 Jan 1903 08:50:09 -> Passed to LISTTEST for delivery. > >This is without the VM userid, right? Correct. > It just means you have the global list >exchange feature (GLX) activated in LMail, which you probably should not do at >this point, The what? How did I do that? >at least not until everything else works and you have updated LMail >to a version that does not think it is running in 1903 ;-) Looks like I'm missing one update. 1.2d is the latest? >That looks good. What does LISTTEST say then? Anyway, it is the correct setting >and behaviour. MAILER console: RDR FILE 0173 SENT FROM SMTP2 PUN WAS 0504 RECS 0007 CPY 001 A NOHOLD NOKEEP 16 Jan 1903 08:17:43 Processing file 0173 from SMTP2@MSACVM 16 Jan 1903 08:17:43 -> BSMTP from [log in to unmask] 16 Jan 1903 08:17:43 -> 1 recipient (1 local). 16 Jan 1903 08:17:43 -> Delivered to TEST. RDR FILE 0175 SENT FROM LISTTEST PUN WAS 0104 RECS 0008 CPY 001 A NOHOLD NOKEEP 16 Jan 1903 08:17:43 Processing file 0175 from LISTTEST@MSACVM 16 Jan 1903 08:17:43 -> Message has MAIL FROM:<> 16 Jan 1903 08:17:43 -> 1 recipient (1 local). 16 Jan 1903 08:17:43 -> Delivered to MAINT. LISTTEST console: RDR FILE 0103 SENT FROM MAILER PUN WAS 0174 RECS 0009 CPY 001 M NOHOLD NOKEEP 16 Jan 2003 08:17:43 Processing file 0103 from MAILER@MSACVM 16 Jan 2003 08:17:43 Sent information mail to [log in to unmask] >LISTSERV will do that if you manage to delete the list between the time when >the message was enqueued to LISTSERV and the time LISTSERV actually got to it. >This is very difficult to do on VM (or even on other systems, And I'm not nearly fast enough. No, I wasn't deleting any lists at the time. >> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 08:54:34 -0800 >> From: [log in to unmask] >> Subject: Undelivered mail >> To: [log in to unmask] >> X-Report-Type: Nondelivery; boundary="> Error description:" >> >> --> Error description: >> Error-For: [log in to unmask] >> Error-Code: 3 >> Error-Text: No such list. >> >> Error-End: One error reported. >If I had to take a bet, I would say that you are pointing to the wrong >LISTSERV. It definitely went to the right service machine, LISTTEST. I was logged on to MAINT, SMTP2, LISTTEST, and MAILER, at the time so that I could watch all the consoles. HOWEVER...now that you've pointed out that possibility, I notice that the message above says it came from "owner-LISTSERV". Should it have said "owner-LISTTEST"? Does LISTTEST have an identity problem? lisa