On 12 May 2003, at 16:38, Rich Greenberg wrote: >On: Mon, May 12, 2003 at 01:38:06PM -0500,Chris Barnes Wrote: > >} Michael Quinion <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >} > Can anybody put my mind at rest on this? >} >} Here is the response I got from the folks at Earthlink: >} * * >} are permanently approved. Just make sure to keep sending your mailing >} list from the same address, and you shouldn't have any problems with >} delivering the list. >} * * >} >} Sounds reasonable to me - it puts the burden of managing their list >} traffic back onto the subscriber (where it belongs). > >Except that means that each dirtlink subscriber will have to add every >poster to the good list as most lists appear to be from the originator >(except digests). Scary point. Let's hope "from" means RFC821 "mail from:" and not RFC822 "from:" ;-) -Kary