Bryan Fritchie wrote: > Since this appears to be an issue, is there a possibility that future > versions can specifically have both an Owner and a Co-Owner property? That > way a Co-Owner could do just about everything except replace the Owner. > Both Owner and Co-Owner could still allow multiple entries, but then there > would be a definitive meaning between the different roles. I don't see a business case for doing this. I have lists where where I assign "Content Administrators". Their job requires complete subscriber access, including assigning editor/moderator ... but I don't want them otherwise mucking with the list configuration. I'm sure 100 other customers could come up with 100 more scenarios. Any solution I can think of would be way to complex to build and maintain. I think Chris' suggestion is best. :-) cheers, wayne