I ended up putting an asterisk after the email address, which got it to go. ADD testlist2 DD=job1 IMPORT //job1 DD * [log in to unmask] * [log in to unmask] * /* -----Original Message----- From: Patrick B. O'Brien Sent: Friday, January 02, 2004 7:58 AM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: RE: FW: Command confirmation request (906F4A9D) Got it to go! Thanks! > ADD testlist2 DD=job1 IMPORT ADD: no error, 2 recipients added, no entry changed, no duplicate, none forwarded. Summary of resource utilization ------------------------------- CPU time: 0.002 sec Device I/O: 0 Overhead CPU: 0.002 sec Paging I/O: 0 CPU model: 450MHz Pentium III (502M) Job origin: [log in to unmask] -----Original Message----- From: Bronna Bodenstein [mailto:[log in to unmask]] Sent: Friday, January 02, 2004 7:53 AM To: Patrick B. O'Brien Cc: [log in to unmask] Subject: RE: FW: Command confirmation request (906F4A9D) I don't see anything obviously wrong with your syntax. I'm going to try adding you to one of my test lists and see if I can recreate the error. Bronna Bodenstein L-Soft Customer Support Subject: RE: FW: Command confirmation request (906F4A9D) Date sent: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 17:25:51 -0800 From: "Patrick B. O'Brien" <[log in to unmask]> To: <[log in to unmask]> I'm here, this is the email and the results, any thought? Thanks, ADD testlist2 DD=job1 IMPORT //job1 DD * [log in to unmask] [log in to unmask] /* > ADD testlist2 DD=job1 IMPORT DDname "JOB1" not found in job stream. > job1 DD * Unknown command - "JOB1". Try HELP. > [log in to unmask] Unknown command - "[log in to unmask]". Try HELP. > [log in to unmask] Unknown command - "[log in to unmask]". Try HELP. > /* Unknown command - "/*". Try HELP. -----Original Message----- From: Michael Shannon [mailto:[log in to unmask]] Sent: Thursday, January 01, 2004 4:20 PM To: L-SUPPORT; Patrick B. O'Brien Subject: Re: FW: Command confirmation request (906F4A9D) Patrick you've obviously gone home already (which is a Good Thing on a holiday :) so I've made an attempt to answer your quesiton on LSTSRV-L. I figured it was worth answering there as it may benefit other LISTSERV users as well. -- Michael Shannon L-Soft Technical Support E-mail: [log in to unmask] *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 02/01/2004 at 10:42 AM Michael Shannon wrote: >Oops..I just saw your post to LSTSRV-L.... > >Can you send us a copy of the original bulk ADD job you sent to >LISTSERV? I'd like to see how it was constructed. > >-- > Michael Shannon > L-Soft Technical Support > E-mail: [log in to unmask] > > >*********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** > >On 01/01/2004 at 11:55 AM Patrick B. O'Brien wrote: > >>Hello Jacob, >> >>I know you're off today. >> >>Just to show you that a lot of stuff is working on Cascade. Still >>can not get to Bulk Operations for a List, is there another way to >>add users? >> >>Should I wipe everything out and do a reinstall? >> >>Thanks. >> >> >> >>1 Jan 2004 11:44:13 Processing file 0002 from [log in to unmask] >>1 Jan 2004 11:44:13 From [log in to unmask]: QUIET SET ealerts >>NOPOST FOR >>*@* >>1 Jan 2004 11:44:13 Requesting confirmation, cookie=906F4A9D >>1 Jan 2004 11:44:13 Sent information mail to [log in to unmask] 1 >>Jan 2004 11:44:34 From [ANONYMOUS]@CASCADE.STATE.NV.US: OK 906F4A9D >>1 Jan 2004 11:44:34 From [log in to unmask]: QUIET SET ealerts >>NOPOST FOR >>*@* >>1 Jan 2004 11:44:35 To [ANONYMOUS]@CASCADE.STATE.NV.US: One entry >>updated. No notification has been sent. 1 Jan 2004 11:46:54 From >>[ANONYMOUS]@CASCADE.STATE.NV.US: OK 906F4A9D 1 Jan 2004 11:46:54 To >> [ANONYMOUS]@CASCADE.STATE.NV.US: The confirmation >>code 906F4A9D does not correspond to any pending command. A (...) >> >> >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: L-Soft list server at CASCADE.STATE.NV.US (1.8e) >>[mailto:[log in to unmask]] >>Sent: Thursday, January 01, 2004 11:44 AM >>To: Patrick B. O'Brien >>Subject: Command confirmation request (906F4A9D) >> >>Your command: >>QUIET SET ealerts NOPOST FOR *@* >>has been received. For security reasons, you are now required to >>reply to this message, as explained below, to confirm the >>execution of your command. Note that the security level of the >>list is under list owner control, and that is the person you >>should contact if you have any complaint about security >>procedures. To confirm the execution of your command, simply point >>your browser to the following URL: >>http://cascade.state.nv.us/cgi-bin/wa?OK=906F4A9D&L=EALERTS >>Alternatively, if you have no WWW access, you can reply to the >>present message and type "ok" (without the quotes) as the text of >>your message. Just the word "ok" - do not retype the command. This >>procedure will work with any mail program that fully conforms to >>the Internet standards for electronic mail. If you receive an >>error message, try sending a new message to >>[log in to unmask] (without using the "reply" >>function - this is very important) and type "ok 906F4A9D" as the >>text of your message. Finally, your command will be cancelled >>automatically if LISTSERV does not receive your confirmation within >>48h. After that time, you must start over and resend the command to >>get a new confirmation code. If you change your mind and decide that >>you do NOT want to confirm the command, simply discard the present >>message and let the request expire on its own. >>------------------------- Original mail header >>-------------------------- X-LSVMFlags: 16 Received: from >>EXCH.state.nv.us ([10.131.11.135]) by cascade.state.nv.us >>(8.12.5/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i01JiCP6022624 for >><[log in to unmask]>; Thu, 1 Jan 2004 11:44:12 -0800 >>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 MIME-Version: >>1.0 Subject: Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 11:43:35 -0800 Message-ID: >><[log in to unmask]> >>X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: thread-index: >>AcPQn9/jZip8yDxFEdiLIgCQJwd5fw== From: "Patrick B. O'Brien" >><[log in to unmask]> To: <[log in to unmask]>