On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Pete Weiss wrote:
>
>It has been my experience that these warnings trigger in as little as
>five minutes!  Furthermore because of the name of the apparent server
>application that is generating it, it seems that it is being delayed due
>to anti-virus/spam processing.
>
>I'd really wish that these "nag" messages were not generated as quickly
>as they appear to be ... they seem to consume needless bandwidth and
>list-owner attention.

I agree, but I filter those crap messages to /dev/null which is fairly
effective at keeping them away from me.