On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Pete Weiss wrote: > >It has been my experience that these warnings trigger in as little as >five minutes! Furthermore because of the name of the apparent server >application that is generating it, it seems that it is being delayed due >to anti-virus/spam processing. > >I'd really wish that these "nag" messages were not generated as quickly >as they appear to be ... they seem to consume needless bandwidth and >list-owner attention. I agree, but I filter those crap messages to /dev/null which is fairly effective at keeping them away from me.