At 11:22 09/02/2004 Thursday, [log in to unmask] wrote: >On 2 Sep 2004 at 11:05, Pete Weiss wrote: > >> At 10:32 09/02/2004 Thursday, [log in to unmask] wrote: >> >> >* >> >* The Nameless Coffee House Mailing List >> >* >> >* [log in to unmask] (Maureen Leblanc) >> >* Owner= Quiet: ,[log in to unmask],[log in to unmask] >> >* Owner= [log in to unmask] (George LeBlanc) >> >* Review= Owners >> >* Subscription= Open >> >* Send= Owners >> >* Ack= Yes >> >* Files= No >> >* Mail-Via= DIST2 >> >* Notebook= No >> >* Notify= Yes >> >* Renewal= Yearly >> >* Default-Options= Repro, Review >> >* Editor= Owner >> >* Stats= Normal, Private >> >* Topics= STAFF, ANNOUNCE, PERFOFRMERS >> >* Default-Topics= ANNOUNCE >> >* X-Tags= Yes >> >* Auto-Delete= Yes,Full-Auto,Delay(1),Max(25) >> >* Created 1998/08 >> End Reply >> >Actually, I'd also deleted a couple of extraneous header keywords >and re-put the header: >default-options= review seemed to not be necessary, what with >send= owners being defined! Editor= owner also seemed >unnecessary with send= owner in place. Depending on your needs, posters'/owners' email addresses can be spoofed by virii/spammers. It happens. Thus if you encounter that problem, you may re-think the "approval" process. >Also updated the spelling of "performers" in the header pete! >Thanks! I had "anxiety" ;-) >Will updating and re-putting the header with subscription= >Subscription= Open,Confirm do it, do you think? That seems to be >fairly protective of everyone.