Many of the list subscribers did not get the message posted to [log in to unmask] Below is screen shot of error message. I am not sure what caused the error message. > Error-For: [log in to unmask] > Error-Code: 0 > Error-Text: 552 5.5.3 Too many recipients > > Error-End: 124 error(s) reported > > ----------------------------- Undelivered message ----------------------------- > Received: from LISTSERV.BSU.EDU by LISTSERV.BSU.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release > 1.8e) with spool id 109544 for [log in to unmask]; Tue, 7 Sep > 2004 15:37:31 -0500 > Received: from 10.192.16.16 by LISTSERV (SMTPL release 1.0i) with TCP; Tue, 7 > Sep 2004 15:27:30 -0500 > Received: from ucmail.uc.edu (ucmail.uc.edu [129.137.3.131]) by portal.bsu.edu > (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id i87KQYa17140 for > <[log in to unmask]>; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 15:26:34 -0500 (EST) > Received: by UCMAIL with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <SJ7LZN2S>; > Tue, 7 Sep 2004 16:23:34 -0400 > MIME-Version: 1.0 > X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) > Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----_=_NextPart_000_01C49518.FAAAAE60" > Message-ID: <886EF25AF8BEF64EB89A820EF84064FF04FEC5EA@UCMAIL4> > Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 16:26:39 -0400 > Reply-To: NAEE Members Only Chat <[log in to unmask]> > Sender: NAEE Members Only Chat <[log in to unmask]> > From: "Vredeveld, George (vredevgm)" <[log in to unmask]> > Subject: new dialogue for NAEE members -- join us > To: [log in to unmask] > Precedence: list > > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand > this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. > > ------_=_NextPart_000_01C49518.FAAAAE60 > Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C49518.FAAAAE60" > > > ------_=_NextPart_001_01C49518.FAAAAE60 > Content-Type: text/plain > > To NAEE members: > > We would like to engage in some dialogue with you concerning the impact of > No Child Left Behind legislation. Many of our members have told us that > NCLB's focus on reading and math has moved economics down the priority > ladder of many schools. At our center, enrollments have dropped, in spite > of concentrated efforts to reverse the trend. I asked my colleague, Doug > Haskell, to explain how he has responded to a more difficult environment. > His comments are attached. > > Please consider a response to Doug's comments. We would like to hear from > many of you. > > This discussion is limited to members of NAEE. We appreciate your > membership and look forward to your participation in this discussion.