On: Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 01:11:42PM -0400,Francoise Becker Wrote: } Because, as of midnight on 5/31 (the beginning end, not the tail } end), the last errors happened on 5/26. So the 5/31 report reported } that the last error was received 5/26. Then on 5/31 -- after the } monitoring report had gone one -- more bounces arrived. When it came } time for bounce monitoring just after midnight on 6/1 it saw bounces } starting 5/26 and ending 5/31. Since this met the conditions for auto- } delete, the addresses were deleted, and no longer monitored. If the } "delay" on your Auto-Delete had been 6 instead of 5, then the report } on 6/1 would have had start of 5/26 and end of 5/31. Francoise & Pete, OK, thanks. -- Rich Greenberg N6LRT Marietta, GA, USA richgr atsign panix.com + 1 770 321 6507 Eastern time zone. I speak for myself & my dogs only. VM'er since CP-67 Canines:Val, Red & Shasta (RIP),Red, husky Owner:Chinook-L Atlanta Siberian Husky Rescue. www.panix.com/~richgr/ Asst Owner:Sibernet-L