Pete, This is one of the headers from the redistributed e-mails Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 Received: from XXXXXXXX ([XXXXXXXX]) by XXXXXXXX with Microsoft SMTPSVC(XXXXXXXXX); Fri, 3 Mar 2006 19:07:59 +0000 Received: from XXXXXX ([XXXXXXX]) by XXXXXXXXXX with Microsoft SMTPSVC(XXXXXXXXXX); Fri, 3 Mar 2006 19:08:06 +0000 Received: from XXXXXXXX ([XXXXXXXXX]) by XXXXXXXX with Microsoft SMTPSVC(XXXXXXXXXX); Fri, 3 Mar 2006 19:17:18 +0000 Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 13:37:38 +0000 From: "XXXXXXXXXX" <XXXXXXXXXX> Subject: Message ("Your message dated Wed, 1 Mar 2006 13:10:29 -0000...") To: No Name Available <XXXXXXXXXX> Message-ID: <XXXXXXXXXX> Return-Path: <> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Mar 2006 19:17:18.0500 (UTC) FILETIME=[16AE3E40:01C63EF7] Any ideas ? Scott Eggleston Senior Systems Engineer Systems & Applications NHS Connecting For Health (NPfIT) 0113 397 3409 [log in to unmask] www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk -----Original Message----- From: LISTSERV site administrators' forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Pete Weiss Sent: 12 April 2006 17:47 To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: Redistribution of old messages At 12:29 4/12/2006 Wednesday, Stan Horwitz wrote: >Can you post a copy of the full header for one of those replicated >messages to this list? Just to be sure, post full-headers from a set (two) of dups. This may help pin-point where the differences start to occur (reading from the bottom UP of the RECEIVED line headers). /Pete This e-mail is confidential and privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please accept our apologies; please do not disclose, copy or distribute information in this e-mail or take any action in reliance on its contents: to do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Please inform us that this message has gone astray before deleting it. Thank you for your co-operation.