Douglas Winship wrote: > Thanks, Pete. Does the order of the options matter, i.e. does it a dif. > if it is > Q listname WITH MIME DIGEST FOR *@* > rather than > Q listname WITH DIGEST MIME FOR *@* > ? Pete Weiss said that the order did not seem to matter at PSU. At Buffalo, also running 14.5, it does seem to matter. Q listname WITH NOMAIL DIGEST FOR *@* returns all DIGEST subscribers, regardless of MAIL/NOMAIL setting. Q listname with DIGEST NOMAIL FOR *@* returns only those subscriptions which are both DIGEST and NOMAIL. This is a difference of around 1,350 subscriptions, on a list of about 4,600+. Interestingly, these two: Q listname with DIGEST NOMAIL FOR *@* Q listname with NOMAIL DIGEST NOMAIL FOR *@* return the same output, subscriptions set both digest and nomail. It appears, at least at Buffalo (running 14.5), that in a "query with" command the options have to be in the order listed in a query output. Those options which are in the wrong order appear to be ignored. Douglas Winshp [log in to unmask]