On: Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 07:45:26PM -0500,Rich Greenberg Wrote: } On: Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 05:41:39PM -0600,Winship Wrote: } } } On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Rich Greenberg wrote: } } > Periodically (basically whenever I think of it) I send in the following } } > to Apple: } } > // job pw=xxxxxxxx } } > review chinook-l all } } > query chinook-l for *@* } } > review sibernet-l all } } > query sibernet-l for *@* } } > // eoj } } } } Just wondering, why are you sending it that way? Why not simply send it } } as: } } review chinook-l all } } query chinook-l for *@* } } review sibernet-l all } } query sibernet-l for *@* } } } } without the old "job" stuff? LISTSERV has accepted "stacked" commands } } for more years than I can recall. The only problem I has found is if } } you include a list archive search you need to be sure to put it last; } } if it is first it is the only one which will be processed. } } No particular reason except habit. Does REVIEW or QUERY need a } password? Aparantly it doesn't because I just tried it. And this time the one thats usually last is last. So I am guessing that its random with the largest one usually coming in last. O well. At least I have removed a bug from my analysis program. -- Rich Greenberg N Ft Myers, FL, USA richgr atsign panix.com + 1 239 543 1353 Eastern time. N6LRT I speak for myself & my dogs only. VM'er since CP-67 Canines:Val, Red, Shasta & Casey (RIP), Red & Zero, Siberians Owner:Chinook-L Retired at the beach Asst Owner:Sibernet-L