At 09:58 3/21/2007 Wednesday, Nathan Brindle wrote: >LISTSERV uses the time as reported by the system and should not require a >patch. What OS are you running? I don't see a problem as a "user" ... Received: from tr11n04.aset.psu.edu (r02a07.cac.psu.edu [146.186.15.17]) by f07n01.cac.psu.edu (8.9.3p2.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA138768 for <[log in to unmask]>; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 10:48:51 -0400 Received: from LISTSERV-1A.INT.AIP.ORG (listserv-1a.int.aip.org [192.58.150.67] (may be forged)) by tr11n04.aset.psu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.2) with ESMTP id l2LEmokQ169760 for <[log in to unmask]>; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 10:48:50 -0400 Received: from LISTSERV-1A (listserv-1a.int.aip.org) by LISTSERV-1A.INT.AIP.ORG (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id <[log in to unmask]>; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 10:47:55 -0400 Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 10:47:55 -0400 From: "AIP LISTSERV Server (15.0)" <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: THANKS To: [log in to unmask] Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]> > thanks You're welcome! Summary of resource utilization ------------------------------- CPU time: 0.000 sec Device I/O: 4 Overhead CPU: 0.000 sec Paging I/O: 0 CPU model: 3.6GHz Xeon 3.60GHz (1024M) Job origin: [log in to unmask]