Should have asked this before: Are there corresponding entries in the sendmail logs to go along with the errors you are seeing from Listserv? -C Nick Abiola-Bisiolu wrote: > We are running the latest version of Sendmail commercial version > (Sendmail Switch) and both Listserv and sendmail are running on the same > box. > Listserv passes delivery to the sendmail application for delivery to all > subscribers. > We have configured the Listserv go.user to use the SMTP_FORWARD to the > sendmail application on the server. > We are not using BSMTP. > > Thanks, > Nick > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Wilson" <[log in to unmask]> > To: <[log in to unmask]> > Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 12:04 PM > Subject: Re: Listserv multiple message > > >> What sendmail version? >> Is this with sendmail running on the same box as Listserv? >> How is Listserv handling the delivery? >> Single-threaded delivery or SMTP helpers? >> Are you using BSMTP? >> >> -Chris >> >> Nick Abiola-Bisiolu wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I am wondering if anyone is having similar experince with Listserv >>> where messages send to a very large list get resend a second time to >>> some of the recipientsc by sendmail due to unknown email addresses >>> retuned by the server local alias table. >>> We have configured our Listserv server in Unix environment and all >>> our staff aliases are resolvable by the Listserv server. >>> According to Lsoft technical support, we have to modify some setting >>> in sendmail timeout to fix the issue, but they have not benn specific >>> about the changes. >>> >>> During email distribution from Listserv, we noted that some of the >>> recipients addreses that are bad are reported back instantly to >>> Listserv by the server alias deamon as shown below. >>> >>> 9 May 2007 15:01:27 Processed 700 recipients... >>> 9 May 2007 15:01:28 Processed 800 recipients... >>> -> RCPT TO:<[log in to unmask]> >>> 550 5.1.1 <[log in to unmask]>... User unknown >>> -> RCPT TO:<[log in to unmask]> >>> 550 5.1.1 <[log in to unmask]>... User unknown >>> 9 May 2007 15:01:28 Processed 900 recipients... >>> 9 May 2007 15:01:28 Processed 1000 recipients... >>> -> RCPT TO:<[log in to unmask]> >>> 550 5.1.1 <[log in to unmask]>... User unknown >>> 9 May 2007 15:01:28 Processed 1100 recipients... >>> -> RCPT TO:<[log in to unmask]> >>> 550 5.1.1 <[log in to unmask]>... User unknown >>> 9 May 2007 15:01:28 Processed 1200 recipients... >>> -> RCPT TO:<[log in to unmask]> >>> 550 5.1.1 <[log in to unmask]>... User unknown >>> 9 May 2007 15:01:28 Processed 1300 recipients... >>> -> RCPT TO:<[log in to unmask]> >>> 550 5.1.1 <[log in to unmask]>... User unknown >>> -> RCPT TO:<[log in to unmask]> >>> 550 5.1.1 <[log in to unmask]>... User unknown >>> 9 May 2007 15:01:29 Processed 1400 recipients... >>> -> RCPT TO:<[log in to unmask]> >>> 550 5.1.1 <[log in to unmask]>... User unknown >>> 9 May 2007 15:01:29 Processed 1500 recipients... >>> -> RCPT TO:<[log in to unmask]> >>> 550 5.1.1 <[log in to unmask]>... User unknown >>> -> RCPT TO:<[log in to unmask]> >>> 550 5.1.1 <[log in to unmask]>... User unknown >>> 9 May 2007 15:01:30 Processed 1600 recipients... >>> 9 May 2007 15:01:30 Processed 1700 recipients... >>> >>> In Sendmail log the same message was generated twice to the same list >>> with differennt message ID and each list of recipients are identical >>> starting with the bad addreses. >>> >>> Please respond with any helpful information. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Nick >> >> -- >> Christopher Wilson >> Information Systems Coordinator >> ISS Technology Operations and Engineering >> The George Washington University >> 202-994-3878 >> [log in to unmask] -- Christopher Wilson Information Systems Coordinator ISS Technology Operations and Engineering The George Washington University 202-994-3878 [log in to unmask]