Ben Parker wrote on 07/03/2007 01:34:07 PM: > I'm not aware of any RFC that defines this spec. But historically, the actual > spec is EOL+dash+dash+space+EOL. i.e. no leading space, but a following one. > Many implementations accept EOL+dash+dash+EOL as equivalent. Any reference for that? Our users have come up with any number of creative ways to offset their signature block. Some use long strings of a non-alphanumeric, or alternating dash/equals or alternating plus/asterisk or any other combination of two or more characters repeated up to 80 or more characters total. Don't get me started on those that want an image of their actual signature or other picture in the sig.