Hello Marty, Yes - this started here on July 20th non-stop and is still going strong. The variation of [log in to unmask], changes frequently, but one pattern that we can see in the logs is that quite often, e-mail is sent to both Listname-Request@ and Listname-L@, but always to the listname-request@ address first and in these cases the variation of [log in to unmask] is identical. What is a puzzle here is that some of this e-mail is going to only recently created Confidential= Yes mailing lists - so we don't know how they are getting the listnames. We anticipate problems if the time delay between sending to listname-Request@, presumably a subscription request, and to the corresponding Listname-L@ was increased, as some of our List Owners might approve/add the subscription. --Trish Trish Forrest Queen's University On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, Marty Hoag wrote: > I used to administer LISTSERV(tm) here long ago but the > current administrators came to me and I volunteered to check > with this list. We're having some mysterious behavior lately. > I just wanted to send a quick note to see if anyone else has > seen this or it is an old problem. We've just started looking > into this.