On 1/26/2008 12:00 AM, Ben Parker wrote: > On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:20:51 -0500, Paul Russell <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> This should not be necessary. ... What secret incantation did >> I forget to recite? > > It is not necessary, so something was missed. You said you didn't add the PM > address as Owner=. But did you put another (non-PM) address there or did you > leave no Owner= address? The latter would be a undefined error condition, who > knows what would happen. > Yes, there was a non-PM owner specified in the original list configuration. I used the web interface to create the list. I have never tried to create a list without an owner= statement, but I would expect LISTSERV to reject the PUT command, whether it is submitted by email or via the web. -- Paul Russell, Senior Systems Administrator OIT Messaging Services Team University of Notre Dame [log in to unmask]