A helpful user wrote me off-list about using Loopcheck= Spam-Delay(0) Can anyone offer experience/advice on whether I should use (0) or (1)? LISTSERV manuals recommend against changing the default setting Loopcheck= Full. Does the FILTER keyword take precedence over the spam checks of LOOPCHECK? matthew black california state university, long beach From: LISTSERV site administrators' forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Matthew Black Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 7:54 AM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Processing delay for non-subscribers LISTSERV appears to delay processing messages to public lists from non-subscribers: 30 Oct 2013 07:50:30 Processing file 0248 from MAILER@servername 30 Oct 2013 07:50:30 -> Inserting top/bottom banners... -> Not a subscriber, will process in 10 minutes. How can we disable that delay? matthew black california state university, long beach ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the LSTSRV-L list, click the following link: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-PEACH.exe?SUBED1=LSTSRV-L&A=1 ############################ To unsubscribe from the LSTSRV-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the following link: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-PEACH.exe?SUBED1=LSTSRV-L&A=1