Ron,
Think about taking up a collection or some sort of creative future financing. LISTSERV 15 is a kluge in comparison to the current version. I remember that I didn't even like the LISTSERV web interface until 15.5 - - and 16.0 release was a tremendous improvement in functionally and ease of use for everybody -- first time subscribers and site maintainers, as well. I think the hosting solutions (I don't mean just L-Soft's) are overpriced.
Just my 2.5 cents.
Greg
Greg Dietrich
SCO ListServ Administrator
Office of the California State Controller
Email: GDietrich @ sco.ca.gov
________________________________________
From: LISTSERV Site Administrators' Forum [
[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Ronald Beatteay [
[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2015 3:35 PM
To:
[log in to unmask]Subject: Re: Interface Issues
I tried it in Mozilla & Internet Explorer, and got the same
results. It's just that I worry about eventually losing all
functionality if problems persist,, first the DMarc issue,,
now users can't post through the interface. I'd just like to
keep it functional. It's a great system otherwise and just
wished I could upgrade. The cost is an issue. ;-(
Some subscribers really like using the interface, they
could go to nomail to spare their inboxes and visit the list
online, and post and reply from there.
Ron
________________________________
From: Pete Weiss <
[log in to unmask]>
To:
[log in to unmask]Sent: Thursday, February 5, 2015 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: Interface Issues
Why is it essential to post via the web interface? Using a different logon id vs. email?
Did you try different browsers to try post?
Pete
############################
To unsubscribe from the LSTSRV-L list:
write to: mailto:
[log in to unmask]<mailto:
[log in to unmask]>
or click the following link:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-PEACH.exe?SUBED1=LSTSRV-L&A=1________________________________
To unsubscribe from the LSTSRV-L list, click the following link:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-PEACH.exe?SUBED1=LSTSRV-L&A=1