Most lists here are
Send= Private
But some do require the intervention of an editor at least some times. And the Editor lists are being hammered; the owners need some relief. We can block all or most of the notifications that are a consequence.
--Joe
If your real concern is non-members, and you would prefer not to moderate members’ posts at all, you should probably just use
Send= Private
Then non-member’s posts are simply rejected out of hand.
Nathan
From: LISTSERV Site Administrators' Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of F J Kelley
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2015 1:04 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: requests to post sent to Editor
Thanks Nathan!
If my real concern were just non-members would
Send= Editor,Hold,Confirm,Non-Member
Send= (listname)
Would this allow members to post, but block non-members unless approved?
From: LISTSERV Site Administrators' Forum <[log in to unmask]>
on behalf of Nathan Brindle <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2015 12:31 PM
To:
[log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: requests to post sent to Editor
Add “,Non-Member” to the Editor= setting. E.g.,
Send= Editor,Hold,Confirm,Non-Member
Makes unsubscribed senders confirm their own messages before they are forwarded to the editor. Note that you MUST also specify “,Confirm” with “,Non-Member” if it is not already specified. That requires Editors to confirm their own postings as well, which is a feature every moderated list should utilize (IMHO).
http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/16.0/listkeyw.html#kSend
Nathan
From: LISTSERV Site Administrators' Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Larry Finch
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2015 12:09 PM
To:
[log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: requests to post sent to Editor
We implemented spam filters in postfix, which we could do because we control the Linux server in addition to listserv.
Best regards
Larry
On Mar 6, 2015, at 11:30 AM, F J Kelley <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Hi,
We have seen a huge surge in spam directed to lists that are configured as
Send= Editor ...
The editors can reject it, but it is becoming a flood. How are others dealing with this?
--Joe
To unsubscribe from the LSTSRV-L list, click the following link:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-PEACH.exe?SUBED1=LSTSRV-L&A=1
To unsubscribe from the LSTSRV-L list, click the following link:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-PEACH.exe?SUBED1=LSTSRV-L&A=1
To unsubscribe from the LSTSRV-L list, click the following link:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-PEACH.exe?SUBED1=LSTSRV-L&A=1
To unsubscribe from the LSTSRV-L list, click the following link:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-PEACH.exe?SUBED1=LSTSRV-L&A=1
To unsubscribe from the LSTSRV-L list, click the following link:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-PEACH.exe?SUBED1=LSTSRV-L&A=1
To unsubscribe from the LSTSRV-L list, click the following link:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-PEACH.exe?SUBED1=LSTSRV-L&A=1