​Most lists here are

  Send= Private


But some do require the intervention of an editor at least some times.  And the Editor lists are being hammered; the owners need some relief.  We can block all or most of the notifications that are a consequence.

--Joe



From: LISTSERV Site Administrators' Forum <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of Nathan Brindle <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2015 1:14 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: requests to post sent to Editor
 

If your real concern is non-members, and you would prefer not to moderate members’ posts at all, you should probably just use

 

Send= Private

 

Then non-member’s posts are simply rejected out of hand.

 

Nathan

 

From: LISTSERV Site Administrators' Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of F J Kelley
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2015 1:04 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: requests to post sent to Editor

 

​Thanks Nathan!

 

If my real concern were just non-members would

 

Send= Editor,Hold,Confirm,Non-Member

Send= (listname)

 

Would this allow members to post, but block non-members unless approved?

 




From: LISTSERV Site Administrators' Forum <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of Nathan Brindle <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2015 12:31 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: requests to post sent to Editor

 

Add “,Non-Member” to the Editor= setting.  E.g.,

 

Send= Editor,Hold,Confirm,Non-Member

 

Makes unsubscribed senders confirm their own messages before they are forwarded to the editor.  Note that you MUST also specify “,Confirm” with “,Non-Member” if it is not already specified.  That requires Editors to confirm their own postings as well, which is a feature every moderated list should utilize (IMHO).

 

http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/16.0/listkeyw.html#kSend

 

Nathan

 

From: LISTSERV Site Administrators' Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Larry Finch
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2015 12:09 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: requests to post sent to Editor

 

We implemented spam filters in postfix, which we could do because we control the Linux server in addition to listserv. 

 

Best regards

Larry

Hmssurprise.org

--

Larry Finch

Reach Me: +1.609.379.2756

Sent from my iPad


On Mar 6, 2015, at 11:30 AM, F J Kelley <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

​Hi,

We have seen a huge surge in spam directed to lists that are configured as

  Send= Editor ...

 

The editors can reject it, but it is becoming a flood.  How are others dealing with this?

--Joe 

 


To unsubscribe from the LSTSRV-L list, click the following link:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-PEACH.exe?SUBED1=LSTSRV-L&A=1

 


To unsubscribe from the LSTSRV-L list, click the following link:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-PEACH.exe?SUBED1=LSTSRV-L&A=1

 


To unsubscribe from the LSTSRV-L list, click the following link:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-PEACH.exe?SUBED1=LSTSRV-L&A=1

 


To unsubscribe from the LSTSRV-L list, click the following link:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-PEACH.exe?SUBED1=LSTSRV-L&A=1



To unsubscribe from the LSTSRV-L list, click the following link:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-PEACH.exe?SUBED1=LSTSRV-L&A=1



To unsubscribe from the LSTSRV-L list, click the following link:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-PEACH.exe?SUBED1=LSTSRV-L&A=1