I’m puzzled that this has been such a mystery. Pete seems quite right to me: if I can post to the list, then I can put the list address in the to: slot, or my “reply all” can do that, and I’ll post to the list. What’s the problem?

-- Russ

From: LISTSERV List Owners' Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Pete Weiss
Sent: June-29-16 10:57 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Force "Reply-to= Sender,Ignore"??


This is not a mystery:

a REPLY ALL by the recipient would no doubt go back to the list regardless of your list definition parameter that you have shown (unless recipient subscriber was NOPOST (or perhaps REVIEW)).

Now it may be that the recipient's MTA (defaults) implicitly to a REPLY ALL as opposed to a REPLY.

On 6/29/2016 06:33, F J Kelley wrote:

The list was set as

  Send= Private



So all subscribers could post to it.



However, all responses were to be directed to the Sender, not the List

  Reply-To= Sender,Ignore



*But* the reply did go to the list.  I am still trying to get the original mail, and it is possible the response was made on a mobile device, which may not be too standards-compliant.  Members of the list themselves may not have recognized what had happened, however, the list owner and her boss sure noticed it.


________________________________

To unsubscribe from the LSTOWN-L list, click the following link:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-PEACH.exe?SUBED1=LSTOWN-L&A=1

############################

To unsubscribe from the LSTOWN-L list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-PEACH.exe?SUBED1=LSTOWN-L&A=1