>>Now, as far as I understand it, PUT isn't working yet for file lists, but >>is there any way we can put some of those buggers on a filelist at one or >>more LISTSERV's (with AFD capability) to reduce some of this monthly file >>invasion/queue? You can bet that this time next week there will be who- >>knows-how-many copies of XMAILER NAMES from NICSERVE waiting to cross >>who-knows-how-many links. >> /Jeff/ > >Better to encourage people to use the NETSERV tools. You get >the BITEARN NODES file once. Then you get the monthly >NODUPT file and merge it into BITEARN NODES using the UPDNODES >program. Works fine. > >Roger That may be true of BITEARN NODES but you still have the Mailer tables and they don't correlate with BITEARN NODES. I was speaking more of them than the latter, as most US sites get their route tables from UCLA (which is yet another file cruncher, but another story). I have no opposition to the NETSERV tools, its only that the US only has *one* of them and its at the same place we get our Mailer tables from anyway.