I just sent my copy of PEERS NAMES to Valdis. I believe that it is correct, because I had to have Eric send it to me directly. Mine got messed up because it wasn't on the A disk. The YALEVM-CUNYVM link being down was a real headache for us also. It was down for close to 4 days. It took almost a day to clear out the CUNY side, and almost 2 to clear out the YALE side, even though when the link came up, CUNY had almost twice as many files queued. (I wonder if that was due to the aging priority scheme that Yale uses, or to their being 2 Listservers to the North of Yale?) I also have seen the problem Marty mentioned about listserv rejecting a distributed mail. But mine were rejected by Bitnic's after they had been forwarded by Marty's listserv. (My chart earlier did not show this, because I thought it was my problem, and I just started again with those already delivered removed, and the new PEERS NAMES, which included BITNIC, and did not include anyone at Marty's) I also concerned that PEERS NAMES still thinks Lehigh is ok to use for distribution. Maybe PEERS NAMES file needs a version number, and it should be transmitted with stuff to help debug some of these problems. Harry