>michael, >am i dreaming or do i have really a better solution for your problem >(ONE release level for ALL listservs) ? >- LISTSERV should be updated on the same as b.pasch does it for > NETSERV. this means that we all don't have to care about any updates! >eric: what do you feel about it ? > -ulrich- If this means having LISTSERV automatically updated from the network, I am unalterably opposed to it. I've seen enough problems with newly released versions that I will *never* update LISTSERV (or anything else, for that matter) immediately. Now that doesn't mean I wait 6 months before installing it, but it means that I have procedures that I follow before I install the new version, which include letting it age until the just-after-release bug reports come in. Richard